Chatsky's love for Sophia description. Images of Chatsky and Sophia in the comedy by A. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit". Sophia close up

Woe from Wit is a multifaceted work. In it one can see social parody, criticism of the regime, and a historical sketch of mores. Not last place the book also features a love affair. Chatsky's attitude to Sophia, their feelings - the core that serves as the basis of the plot, fills it with life and emotions.

Characters through the eyes of schoolchildren

You can endlessly analyze "Woe from Wit". Consider individual storylines

moves with a magnifying glass, to compare quotes with the memoirs of contemporaries and biographies of alleged prototypes. But this is the approach of a professional analyst, literary critic. In school lessons, the work is read in a completely different way. And analyzed in accordance with the recommendations of the methodological publications.

There is a certain type of themes that the Ministry of Education regularly offers to students for reflection and subsequent writing of essays: "Is Sophia worthy of Chatsky's love?", "Was Karenina right when deciding on a divorce?" It is not entirely clear what the education system wants to achieve by this. This analysis has nothing to do with literature itself. Rather, it is a monologue of the grandmother at the entrance, arguing whether Klava was right from the third apartment when she kicked Vaska the alcoholic out, or was she wrong.

And the life experience of a 9th grade student hardly allows you to judge how the character should have acted. It is unlikely that he will be able to understand what annoys Sophia in Chatsky and why. Except, of course, the obvious things - those about which the heroine herself speaks.

Features of the perception of the play

Traditional

The interpretation of the play "Woe from Wit" is as follows - principled, noble and uncompromising. The people around them are low, narrow-minded and conservative people, who do not understand and do not accept the advanced, innovative ideology of the protagonist. Chatsky broadcasts, denounces and mocks, reeks of the vices of society, and society writhes from well-aimed hits, is angry and indignant.

It is difficult to say whether Griboyedov was trying to achieve this effect. There is a directly opposite version, explaining the construction of the play with endless monologues-appeals of the protagonist precisely by the fact that the author parodied the image of a liberal who talks a lot and does nothing. And the characteristics of Sophia and Chatsky are largely determined by how the reader perceives the work. In the first case, he sees an idealistic hero and a bourgeois woman who did not appreciate his impulses, in the second - a chatterbox demagogue and ... all the same, a bourgeois woman who did not appreciate his impulses. Is it so?

Details of plot collisions

Who are Chatsky and Sophia? He is twenty-one, she is seventeen. Separated for three years

back. Chatsky left as soon as he came of age, left the guardian's house and returned to the family estate. Didn't come, didn't write. He just took it and disappeared. For what reasons is not so important. But what should a fourteen-year-old girl in love feel when the man whom she considers her lover, her future fiancé, just picks up and leaves like that? Not for a week, not for a month. For three years. Even at thirty this is a long time. And already at fourteen - eternity. What was he doing all this time? Whom did you think about? Can she be sure that love is still alive?

At fourteen years old, with adolescent maximalism, with adolescent emotionality. Critics make demands on the girl that not every adult woman meets. But Chatsky's attitude to Sophia is far from an obvious point. It is enough to imagine the situation through the eyes of a girl, and not an omniscient reader, to whom Griboyedov told everything. Isn't it more logical to ask: should Sophia keep at least some feelings for Chatsky? And if so, why? He is not her husband, not her fiancé. He is a romantic admirer, who at one point flew away like a moth from a clearing for three whole years. He had a rush of soul. The senses. An offended dignity. And her? She shouldn't have felt hurt, bewilderment, anger in such a situation? Disappointment finally? Penelope, of course, waited for Odysseus much longer - but the situation was completely different. Chatsky is far from Odysseus.

Sophia close up

But all this remains behind the scenes. Yes, an attentive reader will understand everything himself if

will think, but the situation is still served by hints, snatches of conversations, memories. Therefore, it may well elude a person accustomed to seeing only the main storyline of the work. And what is there?

Chatsky suddenly returns to the guardian's house, where he has not been for three years. He's excited, he's excited, he's happy. Chatsky's attitude to Sophia remained the same. But she already loves another. The first is still forgotten. She is fascinated by Molchalin. Alas, the chosen one is very bad. Objectively - he is poor, of the lower class, this is an obvious misalliance. And subjectively, he is a weak-minded sycophant, flatterer and insignificant. Although, it should be noted, the prospects for him are quite good. Molchalin has already begun to make a career and is doing a good job with the task. It can be assumed that Sophia's new chosen one will go far

At the same time, the young man himself is not at all in love, he is simply afraid to admit it. And the prospect of a profitable marriage is also, for sure, very sympathetic to him. Often it is this unfortunate choice that is blamed on the girl, answering the question, is Sophia worthy of Chatsky's love? Traded an eagle for a plucked sparrow, stupid.

And who is Sophia? A girl who grew up without a mother, locked up, practically without leaving the threshold of the house. Her social circle is a father who has no idea about raising children in general and daughters in particular, and a maid. What can Sophia know about men? Where does she get at least some experience? The only source of information is books. Ladies' French novels that papa allows her to read. How could such a girl discern the insincerity of a person who had come into the trust of much older and more experienced people? This is simply unrealistic.

Sophia is very young, she is naive, romantic and inexperienced. Molchalin is the only young man she sees almost every day. He is poor, honest, unhappy, timid and charming. Everything is the same as in the novels that Sophia reads every day. Of course, she just couldn't help but fall in love.

And what about Chatsky?

The personality of Chatsky deserves the same close attention. Is it such a mistake

does Sophia commit? If you look at the situation objectively - is this marriage a big loss in her life?

Chatsky is twenty-one. He could not find a place for himself. Tried it there, tried it here. But ... "I would be glad to serve, it is sickening to serve." And the position that would correspond to his requests still does not come across. What means does Chatsky live on? He has an estate. And, of course, the serfs. This is the main source of income for the young liberal. The one who ardently and sincerely condemns calls him barbarism and savagery. Such is the funny problem.

Does Chatsky have any prospects? He will not make a career, it is obvious. Not a military man - he's not a stupid soldier. Not financial - he is not a huckster. Neither political - he will not betray ideals. He will not become another Demidov either - the grip is not the same. Chatsky is one of those who speaks, not those who do.

His reputation has already been ruined, society is fleeing from him like the plague. It is very likely that Chatsky will spend his entire life in the family name, occasionally leaving for resorts and the capital. What annoys Sophia in Chatsky right now will only progress, with age he will become even more caustic and cynical, embittered by constant failures and disappointments. Can a marriage with such a person be considered a good match? And will Sophia be happy with him - just humanly happy? Even if Chatsky really loves her and will keep this love? Unlikely. Perhaps the play's denouement is tragic only for the protagonist. Sophia was just lucky. I got off cheaply.

And about posing the question

Although, when Chatsky's attitude to Sophia is discussed in the key: is she worthy of such great love or still not - this in itself is strange. It's unethical. How can you be worthy of love? Is this a bonus? Promotion? Suitability for the position held? They love not for something, love just like that. Because this person is needed, and no one else. This is life. And no love obliges her object to experience reciprocal feelings. Alas. The very statement of the question is incorrect. You can not do it this way. Love is not a potato in the bazaar to tell if it is worth what is asked for. And even schoolchildren should be clearly aware of this, not to mention older people.

Comedy by A.S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit" - one of best works Russian literature. The hero of the comedy - a young nobleman Alexander Andreevich Chatsky - in just a day experiences the collapse of all his plans and hopes. We can say that his life changes overnight. The hero was returning home, to his beloved girl, to happy life, and found there only coldness, disappointment and persecution.

Arriving at the house of his father's friend Famusov, Chatsky in the first seconds seeks to see his daughter, Sophia. The hero has been in love with her since childhood and expects a reciprocal feeling from the girl. But Sophia very coldly meets Alexander Andreevich. Throughout the play, Chatsky tries to find out the reason for Sophia's cooling, to find his own, happier, rival.

In the first occurrence of the third action of the comedy, an explanation takes place between the characters. Chatsky wants to “get a confession” from Sophia: “Who, finally, is dear to her? Molchalin? Skalozub? " The hero does not believe that the girl could fall in love with one of these people - after all, one is more insignificant than the other. Chatsky gives capacious characteristics to both candidates:

Molchalin was so stupid before! ..

Miserable creature!

Has he really grown wiser? .. And he -

Wheeze, stranglehold, bassoon,

A constellation of maneuvers and mazurkas!

But Sophia, pouring coldness on the hero, claims that she loves many much more than Chatsky. Alexander Andreevich, in her words, is very "intemperate on the tongue" and cruel to people: "The slightest strangeness in whom is barely visible, Your gaiety is not modest, You are ready to wit immediately ..." It would be better if Chatsky turned his gaze to himself, to his shortcomings ... After all, scolding everyone and everything, he looks funny:

Yes! A menacing look, and a harsh tone,

And there are an abyss of these features in you;

And the thunderstorm above itself is far from useless.

Sophia does not want to talk to the hero anymore and tries to leave. Chatsky, in order to still recognize her "sweetheart", decides to pretend (for the only time in his life!) And admit that Molchalin could have changed. The hero agrees: well, maybe Alexey Stepanich is a worthy person, but does he love Sophia as Chatsky loves her?

Let in Molchalin a brisk mind, a brave genius,

But is there that passion in him? That feeling?

is that ardor?

So that, besides you, he has a whole world

Seemed ashes and vanity?

Chatsky then tries to convince Sophia that she largely invented Molchalin for herself: “God knows what secret is hidden in him; God knows what you invented for him, Than his head has never been stuffed. Perhaps, your qualities are dark, Admiring them, you gave him ... ”That, fearing the girl's anger, recognizes the mind behind Molchalin. He begs Sophia to give him the opportunity to make sure for himself that his rival is a worthy person: "As a person you who is growing up with you, As your friend, as a brother, let me be convinced of that ..." Then Chatsky will be able to calm down ("I can beware ") and forget.

But Sophia is not at all moved by the ardent words of Alexander Andreevich. She was very offended by Chatsky's unflattering comments about Molchalin. Whether she loves her father's secretary or not, "why be ... so incontinent in my tongue?" Sophia accuses the hero of the fact that in life he can only joke: “Joke! And a century to joke! How can you do it! " However, if he got to know Molchalin better, he would appreciate him.

Chatsky is wounded by jealousy: how does Sophia know Alexei Stepanovich so well? And the girl continues to convince Chatsky of the undoubted "merits" of Molchalin: silence, communication with old people, a small but strong mind, compliance, modesty, calmness, etc.

Chatsky does not believe his ears:

He plays all day!

He is silent when he is scolded!

She doesn't respect him! ... She doesn't care about him.

As a result, the hero concludes: "Naughty, she does not love him." Having calmed down about Molchalin, he wants to find out the attitude of Sophia to Skalozub. Chatsky begins to praise him, but Sophia immediately interrupts Alexander Andreevich: Skalozub is not the hero of her novel. Chatsky is perplexed: a girl cannot love the insignificant Molchalin, she is indifferent to Skalozub. Who took possession of her heart? The scene ends with the hero's question: "Who will solve you?"

Thus, Chatsky's intentions were unsuccessful. He never found out who his rival was. The hero does not have the opportunity to calm down, he will be in tense excitement until the very end of the play.

This episode finally clarifies Sophia's attitude to Chatsky, the reasons for her dissatisfaction with the hero. Also, the reader is convinced that the girl loves Molchalin, does not see his shortcomings, which are so obvious for Chatsky. Sophia thought of herself romantic hero without seeing the true face of his chosen one. But Chatsky is convinced that the intelligent Sophia chose someone much more worthy. This thought haunts the hero, intensifies his doubts and torments.

Question 5 of the examination ticket (ticket number 18, question 3)

How does Chatsky's attitude to Sophia change during the action of the comedy by A. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit"?

The play "Woe from Wit" by Alexander Sergeevich Griboyedov belongs to the genre of public comedies. This means that its main conflict is social: the contradiction between the positive protagonist Chatsky, representing the advanced forces of Russian society, and the conservative, vicious environment that surrounds him. At the same time, the action of the comedy is also driven by psychological conflict associated with the unrequited love of the hero. The plot embodiment of this conflict is the so-called "love triangle", the sides of which are Chatsky, Sophia and Molchalin.

In the very general view This plot looks like this. Chatsky and Sophia talked a lot at a young age. They were united by feelings of mutual sympathy. When Sophia was fourteen years old, Chatsky left to gain intelligence on distant wanderings. During his absence, the girl grew up by three years and fell in love with Molchalin, her father's secretary, who lives with her in the same house. Chatsky returned, full of ardent feelings for Sophia, but in response he met coldness and hostility. He tried to figure out the reason for this and eventually found out that Sophia loved another. Her chosen one seemed to Chatsky unworthy of such a girl as Sophia. She, offended by his mockery of the object of his love, in order to take revenge, spread a rumor that Chatsky had gone mad. At the end of the play, Sophia was shocked to learn that Chatsky was right: Molchalin does not love her, but behind her back he is trying to seduce the servant Lisa. When everything was revealed, Chatsky uttered an angry monologue denouncing everyone, including Sophia, and left her and the Famusovs' house.

To understand these intricacies of the plot and try to understand why everything happened the way it is, you need to determine what the character of Sophia is. Is she really a "scoundrel", as Chatsky apparently thinks and how the author of the comedy called her in one of the letters? In other words, can her actions towards Chatsky be called treason, and her gossip about Chatsky's madness - direct meanness? But why did Chatsky decide that Sophia should love him? After all, when they broke up, she was still a teenager, and it is unlikely that such an intelligent person, as Chatsky considers himself, could take seriously the relationship that connected them before. And he certainly should not have assumed that after three years of their separation there would be no changes in the moral development of Sophia. Nevertheless, having arrived at the Famusovs' house after a long absence, he rushes to Sophia as if they parted only yesterday. Sophia, at this moment, is not thinking about Chatsky at all.

On the contrary, he is only an annoying hindrance in the circumstances. Indeed, just before his arrival, with great difficulty, she managed to convince her father that Molchalin was at the door of her room by accident. She is now busy with her new, and maybe the first, we do not know for sure, love. She's just not up to Chatsky now. Nevertheless, when Lisa, just before his appearance, gently reproaches her for having forgotten about Chatsky, Sophia replies to her:

I am very windy, maybe I entered,

And I know and I blame; but where did she change?

To whom? so that they could reproach infidelity.

Yes, with Chatsky, it is true, we were brought up, grew up; The habit of being together every day inseparably Tied us with childhood friendship; but then He moved out, he seemed bored with us,

And he rarely visited our house;

Then he pretended to be in love again,

Discerning and distressed !!.

Oster, smart, eloquent,

I am especially happy in my friends.

Here he thought about himself high -

The wanderlust attacked him,

Oh! if someone loves whom,

Why should the mind seek and travel so far?

So here's Sophia's opinion on their past relationship with Chatsky: childhood friendship. Although, contrary to this definition, in the words of Sophia one can hear the resentment towards Chatsky for the fact that he left her. But, from her point of view, Chatsky has no right to reproach her with the fact that she fell in love with another. She did not give him any obligations. If Chatsky had not been so blinded by his feelings, he would have quickly guessed that he had a happy rival. Actually, he is always on the verge of this guess. But he just can't believe her. First, because he himself is in love. And secondly, he in no way can assume that Sophia is capable of falling in love with such an insignificant person as Molchalin is in his eyes.

And what about Molchalin himself? He is burdened by the love of Sophia. Although, it would seem, in accordance with his character, he should rejoice at such happiness. The goal of his life is a career, and becoming Famusov's son-in-law is a direct road on the way to bureaucratic heights. However, Molchalin, for all his vices, is by no means as stupid as Chatsky thinks. He perfectly understands that if his relationship with Sophia is revealed, he will even lose his current place: why does Famusov need a poor and innocent son-in-law? In addition, Sophia is not attracted to him as a love partner. Molchalin, like Famusov himself, by the way, is attracted to Liza. By the way, her participation in the plot allows us to speak not of a triangle, but of a quadrangle. True, Liza's participation in all these vicissitudes is passive. For her, the "lordly love", and the molestation of Molchalin, and the possible anger of the hostess, who also has a tough disposition, are equally dangerous. And Liza wonders if she should fall in love with the barman Petrusha? She probably likes him, and at the same time, maybe, will protect her from encroachments from other men. Molchalin, moreover, having studied the character of Sophia, among other things, fears that her affection for him will also be short-lived. “She loved Chatsky once, she’ll stop loving me like him,” he remarks shrewdly.

Thus, having considered the love conflict of comedy, we can conclude that everything here is not so simple and unambiguous. And this is explained by the fact that "Woe from Wit" is a realistic work. Everything in it is complicated and confusing, as in life itself. No, Sophia did not cheat on Chatsky. On the contrary, she herself suffered, being deceived by Molchalin. Her act in relation to Chatsky, of course, is a cruel joke, explained by her annoyance at the caustic words he said about her beloved person. And maybe, when Sophia repented after the exposure of Molchalin, Chatsky should have consoled her and supported her in her grief, and not aggravated him with angry words. But Chatsky can also be understood: his anger after what happened was already such that emotions suppressed the mind. However, other opinions on this matter are also possible. And this means that the immortal comedy of Griboyedov still excites us with its incompletely solved riddles.

The main character of the comedy is Chatsky. From the moment he appeared in the play, he participates in almost all scenes and is everywhere opposed to other characters.
Chatsky's love for Sophia is a sincere, ardent feeling. He declares his love to her at the first appearance. In Chatsky there is no secrecy, no falsehood. The strength and nature of his feelings can be judged by his words about Molchalin addressed to Sophia:
But is there that passion in him? that feeling? is that ardor?
So that, besides you, he has a whole world
Seemed ashes and vanity?
Chatsky is experiencing hard disappointment in his girlfriend. He reproaches her for her impetuosity even for what she is not at all to blame in front of him:
Why did they lure me with hope?
Why didn't they tell me directly
That all the past have you turned into laughter?
“Every word here is not true,” says Goncharov. - She did not lure him with any hope. She only did that she left him, barely spoke to him, confessed to him in indifference ... Here not only his mind, but also common sense, even simple decency, betrayed him. He did such trifles! ” But the point is that Chatsky is distinguished by "sincerity and simplicity ... He is not a dandy, not a lion ...". In his feelings for Sophia, he is spontaneous, sincere, honest. At the same time, blinded by grief, he can be hot-tempered and unfair. But this makes the image of Chatsky closer and more truthful to us. This is a living person, and he can be wrong. Who is Sophia, whom Chatsky loves so passionately?
Goncharov said very well about her: “This is a mixture of good instincts with the lies of a living mind, with the absence of any hint of ideas and beliefs - confusion of concepts, mental and moral blindness - all this does not have the character of personal vices in her, but appears as common features her circle ”.
Sophia is young and inexperienced, and her upbringing and environment have already left an imprint on her views and actions. And Chatsky has to admit that he was bitterly deceived in her. However, people love all sorts, and vile and unfaithful as well. It cannot make you stop loving. Here, human merits and demerits are poorly taken into account, and even if taken into account, it is very biased. Love, as they say, is evil ...
So, Chatsky's personal drama complicates the public one, hardens him against the noble Moscow.

Essay on literature on the topic: Chatsky and Sophia

Other compositions:

1. The main motive of the work of A. S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit" is a reflection of the tragedy of Chatsky - a typical representative young generation 1810-1820s, in one way or another participating in social activities... This tragedy includes many moments, but one of the most important Read More ......
2. A. Griboyedov's comedy "Woe from Wit" is a sad story of a man whose grief lies in the fact that he is not like the others. Intelligence, honor, nobility, unwillingness to curry favor - these are the qualities due to which the doors to the society of famus, taciturn, are closed for Chatsky, Read More ......
3. The comedy "Woe from Wit" by Griboyedov is undoubtedly a product of great social resonance. It reflected the rebellious times, when freedom-loving ideas spread throughout Russia. In the center of the play is Alexander Andreevich Chatsky, who embodied in himself best features progressive noble youth of the beginning of the century. Read More ......
4. Chatsky is close to people of the Decembrist style, Famusov is his main opponent, the defender of the autocratic-serf system. Already from the 1st act of the comedy, it becomes clear how much this different people... In subsequent episodes, Famusov expresses his opinion about the books, about the service. From Sophia's conversation with Lisa Read More ......
5. Sofia Pavlovna Famusova is the 17-year-old daughter of Famusov. After the death of her mother, she was brought up by “Madame,” an old Frenchwoman, Rosier. S.'s childhood friend was Chatsky, who also became her first love. But over the 3 years of Chatsky's absence, S. has changed a lot, just as her love has changed. Read More ......
6. “Woe from Wit” is a “public” comedy with the social conflict of the “present century” and “the past century”. The work is constructed in such a way that only Chatsky speaks about the ideas of socio-political transformations, about new morality and the desire for spirituality on stage. The image of Chatsky is least of all a portrait Read More ......
7. Sophia Characteristic literary hero Sofia Pavlovna Famusova is the 17-year-old daughter of Famusov. After the death of her mother, she was brought up by “Madame,” an old Frenchwoman, Rosier. S.'s childhood friend was Chatsky, who also became her first love. But over the 3 years of Chatsky's absence, S. has changed a lot, like Read More ......
8. Comedy by A. S. Griboyedov "Woe from Wit" for real realistic artwork because the author has reproduced the typical circumstances of life. The main character of the comedy is Chatsky. It is really witty, honest and positive hero works. But Griboyedov contrasts Chatsky with another hero - Molchalin. This person Read More ......