How the Poles lived under the Russian Empire. Poland as part of the Russian empire
- The subject and method of the history of the domestic state and law
- The subject of the history of the domestic state and law
- The method of the history of the domestic state and law
- Periodization of the history of the domestic state and law
- Old Russian state and law (IX - early XII century.)
- Formation of the Old Russian state
- Historical factors of the formation of the Old Russian state
- The social structure of the Old Russian state
- Feudal-dependent population: sources of education and classification
- State system of the Old Russian state
- The system of law in the Old Russian state
- Ownership in the Old Russian state
- Law of Obligations in the Old Russian State
- Marriage and family and inheritance law in the Old Russian state
- Criminal law and trial in the Old Russian state
- Formation of the Old Russian state
- State and law of Russia in the period feudal fragmentation(early XII-XIV centuries)
- Feudal fragmentation in Russia
- Features of the socio-political system of the Galicia-Volyn principality
- Social and political structure of the Vladimir-Suzdal land
- Social and political system and law of Novgorod and Pskov
- State and law of the Golden Horde
- Formation of the Russian centralized state
- Prerequisites for the formation of the Russian centralized state
- Social system in the Russian centralized state
- State system in the Russian centralized state
- Development of law in the Russian centralized state
- Estates-representative monarchy in Russia (mid-16th - mid-17th century)
- Social system during the period of the estate-representative monarchy
- State system during the period of the estate-representative monarchy
- Police and prisons in ser. XVI - mid. XVII century
- Development of law in the period of the estate-representative monarchy
- Civil law in the middle. XVI - mid. XVII century
- Criminal law in the Code of 1649
- Legal proceedings in the Code of 1649
- Formation and development of an absolute monarchy in Russia (second half of the 17th-18th centuries)
- Historical preconditions for the emergence of an absolute monarchy in Russia
- The social system of the period of absolute monarchy in Russia
- State system of the period of absolute monarchy in Russia
- Police in absolutist Russia
- Prisons, exile and hard labor in the 17th-18th centuries
- Reforms of the era of palace coups
- Reforms during the reign of Catherine II
- Development of law under Peter I
- Criminal law under Peter I
- Civil law under Peter I
- Family and inheritance law in the 17th-18th centuries
- The emergence of environmental legislation
- State and law of Russia during the period of decay serfdom and the growth of capitalist relations (first half of the 19th century)
- The social system during the decay of the serf system
- State system of Russia in the nineteenth century
- State reform of authorities
- His Imperial Majesty's own office
- The system of police bodies in the first half of the 19th century.
- The prison system of Russia in the nineteenth century
- Development of the form of state unity
- Finland's status within the Russian Empire
- The incorporation of Poland into the Russian Empire
- Systematization of the legislation of the Russian Empire
- The state and law of Russia during the establishment of capitalism (second half of the 19th century)
- Abolition of serfdom
- Zemskaya and city reforms
- Local government in the second half of the 19th century.
- Judicial reform in the second half of the 19th century
- Military reform in the second half of the 19th century.
- Reform of the police and prison system in the second half of the 19th century.
- Financial reform in Russia in the second half of the 19th century.
- Reforms of the education system and censorship
- Church in the system of government of tsarist Russia
- Counter-reforms of the 1880-1890s
- The development of Russian law in the second half of the XIX century.
- Civil law of Russia in the second half of the XIX century.
- Family and inheritance law in Russia in the second half of the 19th century.
- State and law of Russia during the period of the first Russian revolution and before the outbreak of the First world war (1900-1914)
- Background and course of the first Russian revolution
- Changes in the social structure of Russia
- Agrarian reform P.A. Stolypin
- Formation of political parties in Russia at the beginning of the XX century.
- Changes in the state system of Russia
- Reform of state bodies
- Establishment of the State Duma
- The punitive measures of P.A. Stolypin
- The fight against crime at the beginning of the XX century.
- Changes in law in Russia at the beginning of the XX century.
- State and law of Russia during the First World War
- Changes in the state apparatus
- Changes in the field of law during the First World War
- The state and law of Russia during the February bourgeois-democratic republic (February - October 1917)
- February Revolution of 1917
- Dual power in Russia
- Solving the issue of the state unity of the country
- Reform of the prison system in February - October 1917
- Changes in the state apparatus
- Activities of the Soviets
- Legal activity of the Provisional Government
- Creation of the Soviet state and law (October 1917 - 1918)
- All-Russian Congress of Soviets and its decrees
- Fundamental changes in the social order
- The demolition of the bourgeois and the creation of a new Soviet state apparatus
- Powers and activities of the Soviets
- Military Revolutionary Committees
- Soviet armed forces
- Working militia
- Changes in the judicial and penitentiary systems after the October Revolution
- Nation-building
- Constitution of the RSFSR 1918
- Creation of the foundations of Soviet law
- Soviet state and law during the Civil War and intervention (1918-1920)
- Civil war and intervention
- Soviet state apparatus
- Armed Forces and Law Enforcement
- Reorganization of the police in 1918-1920
- The activities of the Cheka during the Civil War
- Judicial system during the civil war
- Military Union of Soviet Republics
- Development of law in the context of the Civil War
- Soviet state and law during the New Economic Policy (1921-1929)
- Nation-building. Formation of the USSR
- Declaration and Treaty on the formation of the USSR
- Development of the state apparatus of the RSFSR
- Reconstruction of the national economy after the civil war
- Judicial authorities during the NEP period
- Creation of the Soviet prosecutor's office
- Police of the USSR during the NEP period
- Correctional labor institutions of the USSR during the NEP period
- Codification of law during the NEP period
- Nation-building. Formation of the USSR
- Soviet state and law in the period of radical breakdown of social relations (1930-1941)
- State management of the economy
- Collective farm construction
- National Economy Planning and Reorganization of Management Bodies
- State management of social and cultural processes
- Law enforcement reforms in the 1930s
- Reorganization of the armed forces in the 1930s
- USSR Constitution 1936
- Development of the USSR as a union state
- Development of law in 1930-1941
- State management of the economy
- Soviet state and law during the Great Patriotic War
- The Great Patriotic War and the restructuring of the work of the Soviet state apparatus
- Changes in the organization of state unity
- The development of Soviet law during the Great Patriotic War
- The Soviet state and law in the post-war years of the restoration of the national economy (1945-1953)
- The internal political situation and foreign policy of the USSR in the first post-war years
- Development of the state apparatus in the post-war years
- The system of corrective labor institutions in the post-war years
- Development of Soviet law in the post-war years
- Soviet state and law during the period of liberalization of social relations (mid-1950s - mid-1960s)
- Development of the external functions of the Soviet state
- The development of the form of state unity in the mid-1950s.
- The restructuring of the state apparatus of the USSR in the mid-1950s.
- The development of Soviet law in the mid-1950s - mid-1960s.
- Soviet state and law during a period of slowing down social development(mid 1960s - mid 1980s)
- Development of external functions of the state
- USSR Constitution 1977
- The form of state unity according to the Constitution of the USSR of 1977
- Development of the state apparatus
- Law enforcement in the mid-1960s - mid-1980s.
- The bodies of justice of the USSR in the 1980s.
- Development of law in the middle. 1960s - mid. 1900s
- Correctional labor institutions in the middle. 1960s - mid. 1900s
- Formation of the state and law of the Russian Federation. The collapse of the USSR (mid 1980s - 1990s)
- The policy of "perestroika" and its main content
- The main directions of development of the political regime and state system
- The collapse of the USSR
- External consequences of the collapse of the USSR for Russia. Commonwealth of Independent States
- Formation of the state apparatus of new Russia
- Development of the form of state unity of the Russian Federation
- Development of law during the collapse of the USSR and the formation of the Russian Federation
The incorporation of Poland into the Russian Empire
The Polish state ceased to exist in 1795, when it was divided between Austria, Prussia and Russia. Lithuania, Western Belarus, Western Volhynia and the Duchy of Courland, which was in vassal dependence on Poland, ceded to Russia.
In 1807, after France's victory over Prussia in the part of Polish territory that belonged to her, Napoleon formed a new state - the Principality of Warsaw, to which in 1809 part of the Polish lands that were part of Austria were annexed. The Principality of Warsaw was a constitutional monarchy. The Prince of Warsaw, on the basis of the union with the Kingdom of Saxony, was the Saxon king, dependent on France. The Principality of Warsaw took part in the war of 1812-1814. on the side of Napoleonic France.
At the Congress of Vienna in 1815, Alexander I, who believed that Russia as a victorious country should receive new lands and secure its western borders, achieved the inclusion of most of the territory of the Principality of Warsaw into the Russian Empire. Austria. Prussia, Russia came to an agreement that the Principality of Warsaw will be transformed into the Kingdom of Poland, will receive a new constitution, according to which the Russian emperor will become the king of Poland, the head of the executive branch of the Polish state. Thus, the new Polish state was part of the Russian Empire on the basis of the union.
According to the Constitution of the Kingdom of Poland, the Russian emperor appointed his governor. The post of Secretary of State for the Kingdom of Poland was established. The legislative body was the Sejm, elected by direct elections by all estates on the basis of a property qualification.
All participants in the war with Russia on the side of Napoleon received an amnesty and had the right to enter service in the state apparatus and in the army of the Kingdom of Poland. The commander of the Polish army was appointed by the Russian emperor as the king of Poland. Many subjects of the Russian emperor were dissatisfied with the fact that the defeated Poles who participated in the war on the side of Napoleon and the defeated Poles received more rights than the victors.
Having become part of the Russian Empire, retaining the effect of its laws, administration, and having a legislative body, Poland simultaneously got access to the Russian, and through Russia, to the Asian market for its goods. In order to reduce anti-Russian sentiments among the Polish nobility and the bourgeoisie, customs privileges were established for Polish goods. Many products of the Polish industry were subject to a customs duty of 3%, while Russian ones at 15%, despite the fact that "Russian manufacturers yelled against such an order." 1 A.A. Kornilov Russian course history of the XIX century. M., 1993.S. 171..
The economic development of Poland, the growing influence of the national bourgeoisie intensified the desire for full political independence and the restoration of the Polish sovereign state within the borders that existed before its first partition in 1772. In 1830, an uprising began in Poland, the main force of which was the army of the Kingdom of Poland. The Polish Sejm announced the deprivation of the Russian emperor of the Polish crown, thereby breaking the union between Poland and the Russian Empire.
After the suppression of the uprising by Russian troops, Emperor Nicholas I issued an Organic Status in 1832, which abolished the Constitution of the Kingdom of Poland in 1815 and liquidated the Sejm, the Polish army. The Kingdom of Poland - this "internal abroad", as it was called in the Russian Empire, was liquidated. Instead, the Warsaw General Government was formed. Field Marshal I.F. Paskevich, who received the title of Prince of Warsaw.
Of the state institutions provided for by the Constitution of the Kingdom of Poland in 1815, only the Polish State Council continued to operate, which became a kind of information and advisory institution under the State Council of the Russian Empire. But in 1841, during the preparation of the new "Regulations on the State Council of the Russian Empire," it was abolished. Since 1857, the Warsaw governorship began to be divided administratively not into voivodships, as before, but into provinces. Certain privileges for the local nobility and tax incentives for industry were preserved, which contributed to the further socio-economic development of the former Kingdom of Poland, incorporated into the Russian Empire.
So, in the first half of the XIX century. the territory of the Russian Empire increased by almost 20%. This was due not so much to economic goals as. for example, in the case of the British Empire, but politico-military tasks, the desire to ensure the security of their borders. The policy of the Russian administration in the annexed territories proceeded from their military-strategic importance and was aimed at their socio-economic development, and not at using the resources of new territories for the development of the central provinces of Russia 2 See: B. Ananin, E. Pravilova, The Imperial Factor in the Russian Economy // Russian Empire in a Comparative Perspective. M., 2004.S. 236-237..
In the conditions of the destruction of the Ottoman and Persian empires, some of the peoples they conquered voluntarily became part of the Russian Empire.
The management of the annexed, conquered peoples, their legal status in the empire was built taking into account their socio-economic, legal, religious and other characteristics and was varied, although it had a tendency to unify, extend to them the principles of administrative management and the laws of the Russian Empire.
During the three partitions of the Commonwealth, this once powerful and strong state ceased to exist. Poland was divided between Russia, Austria and Prussia.
According to the results of the sections, half of the former Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth turned out to be part of the Russian Empire: modern Lithuania, Ukraine, Belarus and the western part of Latvia (the eastern part already belonged to the Russian sovereigns)
History of Polish lands within the Russian Empire
As of 1914, the lands received as a result of the three sections of the Commonwealth were divided into several provinces:
- Vilenskaya;
- Vitebsk;
- Volynskaya;
- Grodno;
- Kovenskaya;
- Courland;
- Minsk;
- Mogilevskaya;
- Podolskaya.
Since the Rzeczpospolita was a multinational state, in different parts of which their own rules were adopted, the Russian rulers tried to act in accordance with the situation. For example, an active policy of Russification was pursued on the territory of Ukraine and Belarus, while in Lithuania most of the local foundations and traditions were preserved.
Russian emperors, dealing with the organization of the internal affairs of the former Rzeczpospolita, took into account the previous experience of the political administration of this country. The main reasons for the crisis at the end of the 18th century were gentry anarchy and the weakness of the central government. Therefore, it was decided to establish a rigid centralized management system on the newly acquired land. Such a policy did not meet with support either from the gentry, who were dissatisfied with the fact that they had been deprived of their former liberties, or from the peasants, who felt the strengthening of serfdom.
Many Poles wanted to find support from France, which at the end of the XVIII - early XIX century began to pose a threat to Austria, Prussia and Russia. So, Polish legions began to appear in the French army. However, Napoleon Bonaparte did not live up to the expectations of the Polish patriots. He used the legions for his own purposes, sending them on the most difficult and difficult missions.
Then the eyes of the Poles turned to St. Petersburg. By that time, Alexander I had become the new Russian emperor, promising liberal reforms to his subjects. He appointed his close friend, an ethnic Pole, Adam Jerzy Czartoryski to the post of foreign minister. Czartoryski proposed to the emperor a project for the revival of the Polish-Lithuanian state, which was to become an ally and support of Russia. The plan was approved, but after the disaster at Austerlitz, Czartoryski fell out of favor and was stripped of his high office. Disappointed Poles again took a pro-French position.
In the course of the conquests, Napoleon subdued those Polish territories that were part of Austria and Prussia. On these lands, the Duchy of Warsaw was formed - a satellite of Napoleonic France. On the territory of the Duchy, the Napoleonic Code was in force, which endowed the local population with a number of civil rights and freedoms.
The defeat of Napoleon and the creation in 1815 of the Kingdom of Poland, headed by the Russian monarch, was taken by the Poles as a new blow. However, thanks to the Constitution of 1815, given to the Poles by Alexander I, the attitude of the local population towards St. Petersburg became more favorable. The constitution allowed Poles to form their own government and revived the Polish Sejm. However, the euphoria subsided after the governor of the Kingdom of Poland, Grand Duke Konstantin Pavlovich, who was distinguished by cruelty towards his subjects, took over. The result of his reign was the Polish uprising of 1830, which ended in failure, massive repression and the elimination of the Polish constitution. At the time of the uprising, Nicholas I, the "knight of autocracy" who fought revolutions throughout Europe, was on the Russian throne.
After his death and the coming to power of the liberal-minded Alexander II, Poles again began to believe in the revival of their national independence. During the reign of Alexander II in the Kingdom of Poland, an upsurge really began, primarily in the economy. However, the reform of 1861 caused unrest not only in Poland, but throughout Russia. The confusion and conservatism of the reform caused the peasants and radical students to protest. Repressions against Polish youth became the reason for another popular uprising already in 1863. The uprising, although it ended in a series of concessions in relation to the Polish peasantry, on the whole meant the defeat of the rebels. Alexander II did not respond too harshly to the Polish uprising, but during the reign of his successor - Alexander III- in the Kingdom of Poland, a tough policy of Russification began. The slightest attempts to preserve national identity began to be suppressed, an attack on the Catholic Church began.
However, the conservative reaction did not mean economic decline. On the contrary, in the 1890s the Kingdom of Poland, together with all of Russia, experienced an economic upsurge and a demographic boom. At the same time, workers' uprisings broke out across Europe against the factory owners and the unjust labor legislation... In Poland, these riots were also in the nature of a national liberation struggle. At the same time, Polish revolutionaries worked closely with Russian neo-people and socialists.
Great hopes for the revival of Polish autonomy were pinned on Nicholas II. However, the new emperor chose to adhere to the conservative course of his father. In 1897, at the dawn of Russian parliamentarianism, the National Democratic Party of Poland emerged, which later took part in meetings of the Russian Duma.
The Russian-Japanese war of 1905 aroused extreme discontent among the Polish public. The First Russian Revolution that followed these events was actively supported by the Poles. Due to the indecision of the Russian emperor, the situation became more and more tense, many Poles switched to armed actions under the leadership of the future founder of the Polish army, Jozef Pilsudski.
Before the outbreak of the First World War, Pilsudski announced that the Poles should side with the Triple Alliance and help Germany and Austria-Hungary to crush the Russian Empire in every possible way. In 1915, the troops of the Triple Alliance occupied the territory of the Kingdom of Poland and founded here a formally independent state, in fact, completely dependent on German politics. The provisional government later tried to return Poland to the bosom of the Russian Empire, but in the spring of 1918 the Bolsheviks signed the Brest Peace Treaty, according to which the RSFSR recognized the independence of the former Kingdom of Poland. A few months later, the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR recognized the terms of three treaties on the division of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth more invalid.
National ascent
First, the disappearance of independent Poland caused a series of civil strife and conflicts among the local population. Representatives of different social groups blamed each other for the disaster. There was a loss of ideals and national values. For a while, passivity and frustration reigned in the country. However, after just one decade, discord began to fade into the past. The national tragedy ceased to be the cause of controversy and became the impetus for the rallying of Poles. Throughout the 19th century, Polish public opinion, one way or another, revolved around the concept of "nation". Most of the authors saw the reason for the fall of the Commonwealth in its backwardness from other European powers and the absence of the necessary social transformations.
An important role in the formation and rallying of the Polish nation was played by:
- participation of Poles in Napoleonic Wars Oh;
- the experience of self-government in 1815-1830;
- participation in the Russian populist movement;
- Catholic faith, which remained for the Poles all this time an indicator of national self-identification.
Like Finland, the Kingdom of Poland within the Russian Empire was actually until the end of its existence as an autonomous entity with its own constitution. In 1915, after the occupation of Polish territory by Austro-Hungarian troops, the unrecognized Kingdom of Poland was formed, and after the end of the First World War, the independence of Poland was guaranteed for
Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth
According to the Union of Lublin in 1569, Poland and the Grand Duchy of Lithuania united into one state, called the Commonwealth (literal translation into Polish of the Latin respublica). It was atypical public education: the king was elected by the Diet and gradually he lost the levers of government. The gentry, that is, the nobility, possessed considerable power. However, the work of the Diet was also paralyzed, since any decision could only be taken unanimously. During the XVII-XVIII centuries. Rzeczpospolita was gradually turning into an object of European politics, and significantly stronger neighbors, Sweden and Muscovy, claimed on its territory. Despite the awareness of the many problems and bleak prospects by the Polish society, no decisive steps were taken to remedy the situation. The king became a figurehead, and the gentry did not want to part with their privileges even in the face of the threat of the state losing its independence.
TO late XVIII For centuries, Prussia, Austria and Russia were most interested in Polish territories. However, Empress Catherine II strove to preserve independent Poland, since this allowed her to single-handedly control this state through her protégés. The Austrians and Prussians did not agree with this position. They put pressure on the Russian government, and Catherine, realizing that a new war could break out because of the Polish lands, agreed to partition.
In 1772, the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth imposed a treaty according to which it lost a third of its territory. Russia received the eastern regions of Belarus and the Polish part of Livonia. In 1793, the second section took place. Russia became the owner of the central regions of Belarus and Right-Bank Ukraine. Only a quarter of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth retained its independence. After an unsuccessful year in 1795, Prussia, Austria and Russia divided the remnants of the country among themselves.
During the partitions, the process of returning the lands that had been lost was completed. Russia did not claim the historical Polish territory, which allowed Catherine to renounce the title of Queen of Poland.
Establishment of the Kingdom of Poland
One of the reasons for the creation of the autonomous Kingdom of Poland within the Russian Empire was the need to gain the loyalty of the local population and thereby secure the western borders. Another reason stemmed from the declarations of the Vienna Congress, which took place after the defeat of Napoleonic France. The three states that participated in the partitions guaranteed autonomy to the Polish lands, but this was realized only by the Russian side.
An important role in the process of creating autonomy was played by the liberal-minded Russian emperor Alexander I. He sincerely believed that this would help organize cooperation and mutually beneficial existence between the two Slavic peoples.
Legal Aspects
Inclusion in the Kingdom of Poland took place in accordance with the provisions of the Vienna Treaties, ratified on May 3, 1815. It followed from them that the Polish lands were assigned to Russia forever.
During the Napoleonic wars, the lands divided between the three states were redistributed. So, in addition to the former territories, it was annexed to Russia. Such a significant territorial increment, of course, corresponded to Alexander's desire to create a foothold for Russia in Europe, but at the same time it brought new problems. They were supposed to be resolved by granting a constitution to the Kingdom of Poland under Alexander I. The emperor's plan provoked sharp opposition from England and Austria. In particular, representatives of these states, referring to the gentry anarchy in last years the existence of the Commonwealth, argued that the Poles had not reached the necessary level of development to get a constitution. They offered to limit themselves to the introduction of local self-government, but Alexander resolutely rejected such a proposal.
Preparation of the Polish Constitution
After the final annexation of the Kingdom of Poland to Russia, a special body dealing with the development of the constitution was not created. The first draft of the document was prepared by the closest advisers of the emperor, including Prince Adam of Czartoriz, a Pole by birth. But Alexander was not satisfied with the document. Firstly, it was excessively large, and secondly, it was imbued with an oligarchic spirit. Czartorizhsky agreed with the emperor's remarks and began to develop a new project.
Many prominent Polish public figures... Through their efforts, a new constitutional draft consisting of 162 articles was drawn up. The emperor personally got acquainted with him and made amendments concerning the expansion of his powers. Only then was the French text of the constitution signed. On June 20, 1815, it was promulgated, and from the next year it came into force. Thus, it took a little more than two weeks to develop the constitution of the Kingdom of Poland, which became part of the Russian Empire.
The document consisted of seven sections devoted to the main problems of the state structure of the newly formed autonomy. Briefly, they can be summarized as follows:
- the basic principles of the state structure of the Kingdom of Poland within the Russian Empire;
- the enshrined rights and obligations of Poles;
- organization and functioning of the executive branch of government;
- principles for the formation of legislative bodies;
- administration of justice and organization of Polish judicial institutions;
- formation of local armed forces.
This organization of articles, their share of the total body of the text of the constitution (the most detailed articles have been developed concerning the executive branch) are fully consistent with the Constitutional Charter adopted in France a year earlier.
Legislature
According to the constitution of the Kingdom of Poland in 1815, the bicameral Diet became the highest legislative body, which also included the Polish tsar (that is, the Russian emperor). The Diet was convened every two years, but if an extraordinary session was necessary, the tsar issued a special decree. The members of the Senate, the upper house, were appointed by the king for life from among the princes, bishops, governors and castellans. In order to become a senator, it was necessary to overcome the age and property qualifications.
The lower chamber was formed from representatives of the provinces of the Kingdom of Poland, and therefore it was called the Chamber of Ambassadors. 77 people belonged to the number of nobles, and a total of 128 deputies sat in the chamber. The size of the Senate should not have exceeded half of this number. Elections to the House of Ambassadors were two-stage, and there was a moderate property qualification for voters.
Equality was established between the two chambers: the king could send a bill to any of them. An exception was made only for laws related to the financial sector. They were necessarily sent first to the Chamber of Ambassadors. The Diet did not have the legislative initiative. Voting on the bill was open, no text changes were allowed, this was the prerogative of the State Council. At the same time, the tsar had the right of absolute veto.
Executive power
The head of this branch was the king. His powers were extremely broad. So, only the monarch had the right to declare war and conclude peace, as well as control the armed forces. Only he could appoint senators, bishops and judges. The monarch was also in charge of the budget. In addition, the tsar had the right to pardon and dissolve the House of Ambassadors with the appointment of new elections.
Thus, the tsar was a central figure in the administration of the Kingdom of Poland. At the same time, he was still an unlimited monarch, since he was obliged to take an oath of allegiance to the constitution. Since he could not be in Poland all the time, the post of governor was introduced, who was appointed by the king. His powers coincided with those of the king, with the exception of the right to appoint senior officials.
Under the king or governor, an advisory body was established - the State Council. He could draft laws, approve ministerial reports, and report constitutional violations.
To solve current issues, a government was created, which consisted of five ministries. Their areas of expertise were as follows:
- religion and education system;
- justice;
- distribution of finances;
- organization of law enforcement agencies;
- military affairs.
Background of the Polish uprising of 1830
Under Alexander I, the Kingdom of Poland within the Russian Empire was one of the most dynamically developing regions. Economic growth was observed in all areas of the national economy, due to which the budget deficit was overcome. An increase in the standard of living is also evidenced by the growth of the population: by 1825, 4.5 million people lived on the territory of the autonomy.
However, crisis moments were also accumulating. First of all, the Polish national elite counted on the incorporation of the lands acquired by Russia in the course of three partitions into the Kingdom of Poland. The position of the emperor Alexander allowed to count on this, but, faced with serious opposition, the emperor abandoned this idea.
Another source of Polish discontent was the figure of the governor - the brother of the emperor, Constantine. Although he tried in every possible way to please his charges, his openly despotic methods of management met with dull resistance. Among the officers, cases of suicide became more frequent, and the intelligentsia united in underground circles, which were banned after the speech of the Decembrists.
The accession of Nicholas I did not cause joy either, unlike his older brother, who did not sympathize with liberal movements and was hostile to the constitution. Despite his personal attitude, he nevertheless took the oath and intended to preserve the methods of government that had developed since the incorporation of the Kingdom of Poland into the Russian Empire. But the Poles decided to strive for independence. In 1828, the "Military Union" was formed, within which plans for an armed uprising were developed.
The uprising and its aftermath
The July 1830 revolution in France pushed the Poles into action. Putting forward the slogan of the restoration of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth within the borders before the first partition, the Polish army opposed the Russian units. The governor was overthrown and narrowly escaped reprisals. It is significant that Konstantin Pavlovich was informed about fermentation in the army units, but he was in no hurry to take drastic measures, fearing less Polish nationalists than the emperor. Nicholas himself, by decision of the rebels, was deposed as the Polish tsar.
Despite fierce resistance, the Polish army was utterly defeated on May 26, 1831. Soon, only Warsaw remained under the control of the rebels, which was held until September 7. By decisive actions, Emperor Nicholas managed to keep the Kingdom of Poland within the Russian Empire. But the consequences of the uprising for the Poles were tragic. Nicholas got the opportunity to abolish the constitution and bring the system of government in line with the general imperial one. The Diet and the State Council were abolished, ministries were replaced by departmental commissions. The army of the Kingdom of Poland was disbanded, and the ability of the local government to manage finances was significantly curtailed.
After the uprising
The privileges of the Kingdom of Poland under Nicholas I were rapidly declining. The Constitution was replaced by the Organic Statute of 1832, which laid down the idea of a gradual merger of Poland with the Russian Empire. The leading positions were replaced by Russian officials, and a number of Polish departments (for example, railways or the Warsaw educational district) became directly subordinate to the central government bodies.
The established authoritarian regime caused a massive emigration of the Polish intelligentsia. From abroad, they tried to rouse the Polish people, especially the peasantry, to revolt by distributing proclamations and appeals. However, the contradictions between the gentry and the peasantry that have survived since the times of the Commonwealth were so strong that none of these attempts were crowned with success. In addition, the Nikolaev administration, in opposition to nationalism, put forward conservatism and clericalism. The influence of the Catholic Church nullified all attempts by emigration to convince the people of the need to fight for independence.
In 1863, the Poles nevertheless launched a new uprising, which the Russian army again succeeded in suppressing. Another attempt to free himself from Russian rule showed that the integration course of Nicholas I was not crowned with success. Mutual mistrust and hostility was established between the two peoples. The situation was not facilitated by the forced Russification: the history of Russia was taught in educational institutions, and the training itself was conducted in Russian.
It should be noted that in the educated circles of almost all Western states, the divisions of the Commonwealth were considered historical injustice. This was especially evident when the Poles were divided between two opposing camps during the First World War and were forced to fight with each other. Many Russian public figures were aware of this, but it was dangerous to express such thoughts aloud. However, the stubborn striving of the Poles for independence did the trick. At the final stage of the First World War, the American President, in his 14 points on a peace settlement, separately brought up the Polish question. In his opinion, the restoration of Poland within its historical borders was a matter of principle. However, the vagueness of the term "historical borders" sparked a fierce debate: should those that formed by 1772 be considered as such, or the borders of the medieval Polish kingdom? Dissatisfaction with the decisions of the Versailles and Washington conferences led to a war between the RSFSR and Poland, which ended in victory for the latter. But international contradictions were not limited to this. A number of Polish regions were claimed by Czechoslovakia and Germany. This, as well as other controversial decisions of the peace conferences after the First World War, led to a new major war in Europe, the first victim of which was independent Poland.
In the summer of 1915, as a result of the Great retreat of the Russian troops, they left the territory of the Kingdom of Poland (or the Privy Vistula region, as it was semi-officially called - part of the Polish lands, together with Warsaw, which was given a hundred years earlier by the Congress of Vienna to the Russian Emperor Alexander I), which actually ended the century-long stay these lands under the rule of the Russian Empire. And 100 years ago, at the beginning of November 1916, the governments of Germany and Austria-Hungary, whose troops occupied these lands after the withdrawal of Russian troops from there, considered it good to proclaim an independent Polish kingdom there. What the following document was published at that time was devoted to:
"Proclamation of the Two Emperors" (of Germany and Austria-Hungary) Proclamation of the German Governor-General of Warsaw on behalf of the allied German and Austro-Hungarian emperors on the restoration of the independent Kingdom of Poland of November 4, 1916 (published in Warsaw on November 5)
“Inhabitants of the Warsaw General Government!
He was led. the German emperor and his leader. emperor of Austria and apostle. The king of Hungary, in the firm belief in the final victory of their weapons and guided by the desire to lead the Polish regions, wrested by their brave troops at the cost of heavy sacrifices from Russian rule, towards a happy future, agreed to form from these regions an independent state with a hereditary monarchy and a constitutional system. A more precise definition of the boundaries of the Kingdom of Poland will be done in the future. The new kingdom, in its connection with both allied powers, will find the guarantees it needs for the free development of its forces. Her own army will continue to live the glorious traditions of the Polish troops of the past and the memory of the brave Polish comrades-in-arms in the great modern warfare... Its organization, training and command will be established by mutual agreement.
The allied monarchs strongly hope that the wishes of the state and national development of the Kingdom of Poland will henceforth be fulfilled with due regard for general political relations in Europe and the well-being and security of their own lands and peoples.
The great powers, which are the western neighbors of the Kingdom of Poland, will be happy to see how a free, happy and joyful state of its own national life emerges and flourishes on their eastern border. "
The reaction of the Russian government:
“The German and Austro-Hungarian governments, taking advantage of the temporary occupation of a part of Russian territory by their troops, proclaimed the separation of the Polish regions from the Russian Empire and the formation of an independent state from them. At the same time, our enemies have the obvious goal of producing a recruitment in Russian Poland to replenish their armies.
The imperial government sees in this act of Germany and Austria-Hungary a new gross violation by our enemies of the basic principles of international law, which prohibit forcing the population of regions temporarily occupied by military force to raise arms against their own fatherland. It recognizes the said act as invalid.
On the essence of the Polish question, Russia has already twice said its word since the beginning of the war. Its intentions include the formation of an integral Poland from all Polish lands with the granting of it, at the end of the war, the right to freely build its national, cultural and economic life on the basis of autonomy, under the sovereign scepter of the Russian sovereigns and while maintaining a single statehood.
This decision of our august sovereign remains adamant. "
... and the Provisional Government of Prince Lvov:
The old state order in Russia, the source of your and our enslavement and disunity, has now been overthrown forever. Liberated Russia, represented by its provisional government, vested with full power, hastens to address you with fraternal greetings and invites you to a new life of freedom.
The old government gave you hypocritical promises that it could, but did not want to keep. The middle powers took advantage of her mistakes to occupy and devastate your land. For the sole purpose of fighting Russia and her allies, they gave you illusory state rights, and moreover not for the entire Polish people, but only for one part of Poland temporarily occupied by enemies. At this price, they wanted to buy the blood of a people who had never fought to preserve despotism. Even now the Polish army will not go to fight for the cause of oppression of freedom, for the separation of their homeland under the command of the age-old enemy.
Brothers Poles! The hour of great decisions is coming for you too. Free Russia invites you to join the ranks of fighters for the freedom of peoples. Having thrown off the yoke, the Russian people also recognize for the fraternal Polish people the full right to determine their own destiny by their own will. True to the agreements with the allies, true to the common plan with them to combat militant Germanism, the provisional government considers the creation of an independent Polish state, formed from all lands inhabited by the majority of the Polish people, a reliable guarantee of lasting peace in a future renewed Europe. United with Russia by a free military alliance, the Polish state will be a solid bulwark against the pressure of the middle powers (Germany and Austria-Hungary) on the Slavs.
The liberated and united Polish people will themselves determine their political system, expressing their will through a constituent assembly convened in the capital of Poland and elected by universal suffrage. Russia believes that the peoples associated with Poland for centuries of living together will receive a firm guarantee of their civil and national existence.
The Russian constituent assembly will have to finally seal the fraternal alliance and give its consent to those changes in the state territory of Russia that are necessary for the formation of an independent Poland from all its now scattered parts.
Accept, brothers, Poles, the fraternal hand that free Russia is extending to you. Faithful keepers of the great traditions of the past, stand now to meet a new day in your history, the Sunday of Poland. Let the union of your feelings and hearts precede the future union of our states and let the old call of the glorious heralds of your liberation sound with renewed and irresistible force: forward to the struggle, shoulder to shoulder and hand to hand, for our and your freedom! "
PS It is noteworthy, however, that Poland celebrates its independence day not on November 5, when the act of the two emperors was proclaimed on the restoration of the independent Polish kingdom, but on November 11, the day of Germany's recognition of its defeat in World War I. war, the 1st Armistice of Compiegne). A day later, the governing body of this very kingdom - the Regency Council - transferred power to Józef Pilsudski, who was then oriented towards the victorious Entente.